Vijay Singh also agreed he originally had a good relationship with the Sica family and they had looked after his family when Vijay Singh was away on business f or long perio ds. On two occasions when he argued with Neelma - once when she was working on a computer with Sica and on another occasion when they were playing with Sica's children in a park - Sica had not joined in. Mr Singh also told Mr Di Carlo he originally had no problems with Max Sica. Dutta had to sell his only remaining property: "You steamrolled them as if strangers." "I did a business dealing, it was protocol," Vij ay Singh replied, agreeing business was business. "I don't call it bankrupt," Vijay Singh said. "You got a judgment in your favour and you bankrupted him (V.L. Dutta passed away, their business failed and they couldn't pay the balance of money owed to Vijay Singh who took court action against them. Mr Di Carlo said as a result of the restraint of trade being lifted Vijay Singh had gone back to Fiji and started a new company which was in direct opposition to the Duttas. "That is Shirley's version I don't agree with that," he said. Vijay Singh also said he didn't recall whether he argued with his wife Shirley about pressing V.C. Dutta was sick in bed and dying but Vijay Singh rejected the claim. Mr Di Carlo accused Vijay Singh of pressing the point while V. Vijay Singh agreed when he sold the business there was a restraint of trade clause which prevented him from working in Fiji in any similar business However, when the Duttas defaulted they renegotiated the contract with the restraint clause removed and a new interest rate. Dutta couldn't repay $140,000 in time and they started to negotiate an agreement variation. He was to receive $500,000 (Fijian) and was to get another $250,000 in Australia. Dutta, who he regarded as brother-in-law, and on behalf of V. Earlier, Mr Di Carlo asked extensive questions about when Vijay Singh sold his business to V.C. He agreed with Mr Di Carlo, Shirley Singh would get drunk and be ill when he hired the prostitutes. the children were not home," V ijay Singh said. Mr Di Carlo asked whether Vijay Singh had hired a prostitute to come to his house for sex when they lived at Stafford. Vijay Singh agreed that Shirley Singh would "tease him" but she would do nothing. He also denied he had "turned on" Sica when he discovered Sica and Shirley had pretended to have sex to please him. Vijay Singh rejected the claim and also that he pressured Shirley Singh into going to the casino to pick up strange men for sex so that she could tell him about it. Mr Di Carlo accused Vijay Singh of wanting Shirley Singh to have sex with Sica and he could listen over the phone while he was in Fiji. "No, I don't agree with that," Vijay Singh said. He asked if Vijay Singh had thought Sica was gay and would take part in a sexual threesome. Barrister Sam Di Carlo, for Sica, put it to Vijay Singh that he had asked his wife Shirley Singh to approach Sica to have sex with them. Vijay Singh was being cross-examined on the eighth day of a Supreme Court trial in Brisbane in which Sica, 41, has pleaded not guilty to murdering Neelma Singh, 24, Kunal Singh, 18, and Sidhi Singh, 12, at their home at Bridgeman Downs, in Brisbane's north, on April 21, 2003.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |